The cost of inconsistency is now high enough to slow hiring and erode trust. By standardising evidence capture, Maslow could help you recover $131,893 in otherwise lost productivity and hiring risk.

Interviewer hours lost

432 hrs

Coordination cost

$18,692

Decision-risk cost

$311,040

Annual waste

See the opportunity gap between today's process and a more structured path with Maslow.

Potential savings

$131,893

Reduce duplicate questioning

Shared prep and competency ownership cut repeated interviews that produce little new evidence.

Shrink feedback chasing

Structured post-interview capture lowers the time spent extracting notes from busy interviewers.

Improve decision confidence earlier

Clear evidence reduces the odds of expensive rework and avoidable bad hires.

Share your results

Hiring is a team sport. Share these insights with your colleagues or follow Maslow for the latest in talent strategy.

Follow Maslow on LinkedIn

How we calculated this

Cost of chaos methodology

This calculator applies industry-standard fiscal formulas, including cost-of-vacancy (CoV) and cost-of-bad-hire (CoBH), adjusted for localised salary bands and organisational productivity debt.

Direct replacement cost: The tangible fiscal reality of recruiter fees, advertising spend, and the administrative burden of onboarding.
Productivity debt: The opportunity cost of a role remaining vacant or under-resourced, typically calculated at 1.5x to 3x base salary.
Decision risk: The projected annual cost of 'bad hires' based on current failure rates and a conservative 1.6x salary replacement multiplier.
Coordination tax: The salary value of leadership and interviewer hours diverted from core business output to process friction.